Submitted by: Medinda, Nova<\/strong>
\nOn: Jan 28, 2023 @ 10:45 AM<\/strong>
\nIP: 36.85.1.110<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n
\ndisputes were resolved at the WTO as a result of the RED II policy and the Delegated Regulation which Indonesia considered discriminated against CPO where the European Union issued the RED II policy and the Delegated Regulation which categorized palm oil as the only vegetable oil commodity the risk of ILUC is high because it causes deforestation and will be reduced slowly to 0% in 2030 to meet the renewable energy target of 32% in 2030. The author uses descriptive research methods and literature analysis with primary and secondary data sources. The data analysis technique is qualitative. The results of the study show that Indonesian CPO
\nactually has an important role in meeting the demand for vegetable oil in the EU and the EU will use sunflower oil as an alternative. Indonesia itself before the RED II
\npolicy was enacted had made various efforts for sustainable CPO such as ISPO, PSR, One Map Policy, Indonesia-Dutch Cooperation for sustainable palm oil, IndonesiaSwitzerland CPO trade agreement, Meeting of world palm oil producing countries, and others. Lastly the Oil Palm Diplomacy Joint Mission. However, the European
\nUnion still enforces the RED II policy so that Indonesia decides to file a lawsuit
\nthrough the WTO because of discrimination by the European Union and for Indonesia this has violated WTO trade regulations. This dispute is registered with the WTO under case number DS593 and is already at the panel stage. Until now, this case has not yet released the results from the panel. <\/strong><\/li>\n